Comcast fires all TechTV staff
Fri May 07, 2004 9:14 am
Fri May 07, 2004 9:16 am
BAH! Bah! BAH!!!!
BAH!
Anger stifling word resourcefulness..
BAH!!!
BAH!
Anger stifling word resourcefulness..
BAH!!!
Fri May 07, 2004 9:23 am
I have that G4 channel and it sucks. I watch TSS almost every day and would hate to lose it
Fri May 07, 2004 9:43 am
Well...
They were talking about maybe merging with G4... plus, they only shut down the San Fran. studios. They are reposting the jobs in LA to those interestered.
But yes.. this SUCKS if some don't come back.. or if they just scratch the idea all together.
On a lighter note.. at least the girls could still do Playboy
They were talking about maybe merging with G4... plus, they only shut down the San Fran. studios. They are reposting the jobs in LA to those interestered.
But yes.. this SUCKS if some don't come back.. or if they just scratch the idea all together.
On a lighter note.. at least the girls could still do Playboy
Re: Comcast fires all TechTV staff
Fri May 07, 2004 9:58 am
Originally posted by Folic_Acid
Of all the boneheaded, idiotic things to do, this has got to be one of the worst.
That is lame. Love that show, watch it all the time.
Fri May 07, 2004 9:59 am
Originally posted by Ryan
On a lighter note.. at least the girls could still do Playboy
THEY'D BETTER! It's one thing to deprive me of the shows, it's a whole different matter of raising my hopes to high places and then smashing them to pieces!!!!
Fri May 07, 2004 10:27 am
Just a hunch, but I would bet that Tech TV needs to not exist because of Most Favored Nations provisions in there respctive affiliation agreements. i.e. if Tech TV were to exist Comcast would have to lower the monthly rate for its subsribers of G4 to the Tech TV rate. What's probably going to happen is that Comcast will now receive the G4 rate for past Tech TV subscribers. Comcast probably bought subscribers first and programming second. More eyeballs = more advertising revenue. They will still have to deliver the goods on programming to support the advertising so I would assume that they would incorporate some of the better tech tv stuff.
Fri May 07, 2004 10:32 am
*NSFW*
Link goes to Playboy's TechTV article. No boobs, but the advertisements are suggestive.
*NSFW*
http://www.playboy.com/features/features/techtv/
*NSFW*
Link goes to Playboy's TechTV article. No boobs, but the advertisements are suggestive.
*NSFW*
http://www.playboy.com/features/features/techtv/
*NSFW*
Fri May 07, 2004 10:39 am
sara is the only one in my eyes thats even half way good lookin. the screen savers rule!!
Fri May 07, 2004 10:43 am
Originally posted by ShipWreck
sara is the only one in my eyes thats even half way good lookin
Ever take a good look at Jessica Corbin? Va va voom!
Fri May 07, 2004 10:46 am
yeah, shes ok. i wouldn't kick her outta bed for eating crackers, but cat and morgon are bleh..
Fri May 07, 2004 10:48 am
Originally posted by ShipWreck
yeah, shes ok. i wouldn't kick her outta bed for eating crackers, but cat and morgon are bleh..
Word.
Fri May 07, 2004 10:54 am
I think the Laura would be the best model though.
Fri May 07, 2004 4:03 pm
lame anyway
Fri May 07, 2004 4:27 pm
I watch tech tv periodically, but I still cannot believe they are letting everyone go!
No more screensavers, call for help, or xplay
No more screensavers, call for help, or xplay