Direct Threats

by **#1HiTPoInT** » Sun Mar 30, 2003 10:32 pm

Which country do you think is most directly affected by the threat of terrorism? I chose to not include so many countries on this one because the US and GB are doing more about it than most countries as far as financial aid, man power, and weaponry.

by **#1HiTPoInT** » Sun Mar 30, 2003 11:17 pm

I think the United States is because we we're the one's that were actually most ATTACKED.

(a.k.a. 9/11, September 11)

by **[WEF]Herr Renz** » Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:26 pm

US, who else? they go to war so... they will be the target for the next 50 years

by **Jeffro** » Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:38 pm

Originally posted by [WEF]Herr Renz
US, who else? they go to war so... they will be the target for the next 50 years

Nm...

by **bayotanzk** » Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:42 pm

Get in line.

by **Giggles** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:48 am

I think UK. We are only a small country and a few well placed chemical missiles are enough to wipe out the nation....

Just my opinion anyway.....

Giggles.

by **NightVision** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 9:00 am

I think both US and UK !! We are both in the war togeter and
there for, both targets. The UK is closer to the Middle East
it maybe easier to hit.

by **[WEF]Herr Renz** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 10:40 am

its much more difficuled to get into the UK ... (i'm not talking about a fired missile now

)
but terrorists can't get in that easy... it isn't that big as the us and its surrended by water...

so i think US has more chance... and in the war UK is just cleaning up the left-overs so... be lucky for that you that live in UK

by **[RD]{gen}Beast** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 11:04 am

yeah i think US too its much bigger and easier to get in to then in UK and yes hitpoint agree US had some very bad terrorist attacks (like the one on the twin towers)

by **Rule of Wrist** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:51 pm

People in the Middle East are trained and indoctrinated to hate jews and israel from a young age.

Israel is surrounded by countries and groups that want to drive it into the sea.

They will continue to be the focus of terrorism.
They have fared much worse proportionately than the US in the last 2 years.

by **#1HiTPoInT** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:55 pm

Giggles has a point, seeing that the UK is a very small little country. Regardless of a military advantage they have over the world (disregarding the United States, of course) one Hydrogen or Nuclear could totally, even possibly, destroy the entire country.

But any attack like that on a country that well respected and on the security council of the United Nations is bound to bring an end to the civilized world and bring all out war to the opposers.

by **#1HiTPoInT** » Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:56 pm

I've got another question.

To all you who voted "other"~

Which country would you think and why?

Direct Threats

Who do you think is the most directly affected by the threat of terrorism?

Direct Threats

Who is online