Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:07 pm
Originally posted by -HaVoC-
Did we or did we not rebuild Germany? We did.
Did we or did we not save Europe from utter annialation? We did?
we didn't take over these country's and plunder them. We gave them back to the people and helped them rebuild.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:09 pm
Originally posted by RCinator
One key difference between then and now is UN support. Had it then, don't yet have it now.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:15 pm
Originally posted by RCinator
I'm not anti-war by any means and I do believe that we need to do something about Saddam. I also believe there will be a time when war is the last remaining option, I just do not think that the time is now - it should be put off as long as possible to allow for that small chance that things can be brought to a peacefull resolution.
"Hussein will be given 'a last chance to comply before he gets clobbered,' The New York Times on Monday quoted an unidentified U.S. official as saying."--CNN.com, Jan. 27, 1998
"Annan Admits Iraq Trip Could Be Last Chance for Peace"--CNN.com, Feb. 18, 1998
"Clinton: Iraq Has Abused Its Last Chance"--CNN.com, Dec. 16, 1998
"The White House suggested Wednesday that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has missed his 'last chance' to disarm."--CNN.com, Dec. 18, 2002
"Future European Union members endorsed a joint declaration Tuesday warning Saddam Hussein he has one last chance to disarm."--Associated Press, Feb. 18, 2003
Now .. what’s this “rush to war” nonsense?
(*** yes, lets give him 12 more years, I mean, look how much cooperation he has givin us so far (sarcasm by the way), ***)Originally posted by FLOPPY
I only know only one country that used atom bombs on people. And for my opinion, that is as horrible as using chemical weapons. It might have been the enemy back then, but it were still people.Originally posted by FLOPPY
Well, with the nukes dropped it were only the million Japanese that died, but that is probably not so terrible for you, right Ralph? You dont have to live in a country full of radiation.
Here it is proved again that there are no real winners in a war. Same thing in Iraq. Better thing is to find a peacefull solution first , and then a aggressive one. And that "sympathy for Saddam" isnt really sympathy for that man, but just that little sane voice in their head that says: AVOID WAR.
In times of war I would much rather lose 1 million of my enemy than 1 million of my own.
As for their being no winners in a war, how can you say that, the mere fact that we are here today having an open discussion and people are in the streets calling their leaders every name in the book is proof that thier are winners in a war.
On closing, I would like to add another link that will give another reason to get rid of saddam hussien.
This is for all the appeasers out there who say by attacking iraq only innocent live will be lost, ***newsflash, innocent lives are being lost every day in iraq right now!***
WARNING...these pictures are very disturbing!
http://www.krg.org/reference/halabja/index.asp#
(after entering web page, go to "Pictures tell the story: Slide Show ")Originally posted by RCinator
One key difference between then and now is UN support. Had it then, don't yet have it now.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:19 pm
[i]I am tired of the debate over this issue to be honest. It's just the whole anit-american sentiment that bleeds out of Hollywood and eminates throughout this country that boils my blood.[/B]
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:22 pm
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:32 pm
<Links were here>
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:45 pm
Originally posted by seigfreid
I know it is not what you are suggesting, but a similar argument has been made against doing anything about Iraq because the United States once supported him. For me, this fact should not prevent us from taking action if necessary, but instead gives us even more of a responsibility to get rid of him.
they did support him publicly, they also privately funded his enemy, the ayatolla in iran. both at same time
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:47 pm
Originally posted by Allister FiendGood Job Havoc, Farginmofo, Ralph Wiggum and Freedom
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:48 pm
Originally posted by MMmmGood
I didnt mean for this to turn into a political debate.
Thread moved.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:53 pm
Originally posted by FLOPPY
Well this has been a mature discussion for ALL of us. Good Job to ALL.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:56 pm
Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:58 pm
Originally posted by FLOPPY
Well this has been a mature discussion for ALL of us. Good Job to ALL.
Anyway, just wanted to say that the USA is a great country, I surely do not hate it or anything. I just wanted to express my opinion, you know, freedom of expression![]()
If I offended any person, accept my apologies for doing it.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:03 pm
Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:05 pm
This page is dedicated to the people of Halabja who on March 16th, 1988 suffered the worst chemical attacks committed by Iraqi regime. On that day, 5,000 innocent civilians immediately perished.
The gases used included mustard gas, nerve agents sarin, tabun and VX. This was the largest chemical attack on a civilian population ever.
During those three days, the town and the surrounding district were unmercifully attacked with bombs, artillery fire, and chemicals. The chemical weapons were the most destructive of life. The chemicals used included mustard gas and the nerve agents sarin, tabun, and VX. At least 5,000 people died immediately as a result of the chemical attack and it is estimated that up to 12,000 people in all died during the course of those three days.
Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:11 pm
Originally posted by FLOPPY
Well this has been a mature discussion for ALL of us. Good Job to ALL.
Anyway, just wanted to say that the USA is a great country, I surely do not hate it or anything. I just wanted to express my opinion, you know, freedom of expression![]()
If I offended any person, accept my apologies for doing it.