Who's next after Saddam?

by **Rule of Wrist** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 4:31 am

I think once this Iraq "war" (cakewalk?) is over in a few days that we should eventually move on to the "Palestinian" terror groups. They are the ones who brought terrorism into fashion back in the 60's and 70's...

I say just let Israel loose on 'em. They don't need any material help from us. We'll just cover their flank in the international stage so that they can work their magic....

Any thoughts?

:flame:

by **[RD]{gen}Beast** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 5:30 am

next will be nort corea i think because of the atomnweapons they have

by **rust** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 7:56 am

I dont know if we will attack North Korea next but they
have to be dealt with somehow.After all the squeaky
wheel gets the grease.So lets go grease 'em.
:flame:

by **-HaVoC-** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 9:13 am

People you need to read a little history before making geopolitical decisions.

We took the Palestinians land and gave it to Israel. That doesn't seem very fair now does it. In either case, the murder of innocent men, woman and children is the sign of uneducated people that are deeply rooted in religious facism.

I feel we need to at least divide the land between the Israeli's and the Palestinians. The problem is they worship the same damn land.

But then again wtf do I know. If they can't solve it why should we be able to.

by **rust** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 9:58 am

whats reading???

by **El Cid** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:07 am

Hey Havoc, "we" took nothing from the Palestinians. The British had that area. And yeah it sucks that Palestinians got burned, but they haven't helped their cause by packing up and leaving for Jordan and Egypt.

Personally I'm excited, and glad that this Iraqi think is underway. So far the Iraqi's have turned out to welcome the US forces, because we truly are liberating them, and the fricken closed minded spoiled liberals who can't see that and are complaining right now are going to be remembered as being the historical idiots that they are.

I think what is next is limiting the Nuclear Club. The US has to unfortunately handle the disarmarament of Russia, and India and Pakistan, as well as Isreal, Iran and North Korea. These countries can't use nuclear weapons, so there's no point in them having them. That requires money, so we need to figure out a way to finance this all, becuase were doint the world a great favor but spending a hell of a lot of money doing it.

by **Wairudo Enjin** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:15 am

El Cid,

I'm sorry to say dude, but with statements like the ones you just made, you are sounding on par with BloodBuddha as far as your comprehension of world affairs.

by **SilverSurfer** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:03 am

next will be the entire world cause not everybody kisses the ass of america and because america is the only one that can have nuclear weapons

:flame:

by **COL.BUKKAKE** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:18 am

Originally posted by [A.S.H.]SilverSurfer
next will be the entire world cause not everybody kisses the ass of america and because america is the only one that can have nuclear weapons

Well we all cant be socialist countries and rely on terrorist to take down the BIG BOSS (USA), just think Silver, you country and countries like France have aligned themselves with the likes of Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Bet your proud.

I think we will pull our troops out of Saudi Arabia, put them into a liberated Iraq and force the Saudi's to use reform in their teachings of Islam. Put some pressure on Iran(who knows, amybe the Iranians will take down their leaders themselves).

As for Isreal and the palestinians, what can be said, no Arab will be happy until the death of Isreal. I truly believe land has nothing to with it. Picture a coke bottle in the middle of a football field and that is what Isreal looks like in the middle of the Arab countries. Seems a little ridiculous to believe its a battle over land.

by **SilverSurfer** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:28 am

col didn't want to step on your feet
and do not i tell you do not compare me with france

my opinion is that the weapon inspections where doing a good job perhaps more of them could have been a better solution for a war but who will tell us

grtz silver

btw we have not alligned ourselfes with terrorist like osama and if you don't believe that you better watch out or there will be a plain stuck in your ass

by **COL.BUKKAKE** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:42 am

Originally posted by [A.S.H.]SilverSurfer
col didn't want to step on your feet
and do not i tell you do not compare me with france

my opinion is that the weapon inspections where doing a good job perhaps more of them could have been a better solution for a war but who will tell us

grtz silver

btw we have not alligned ourselfes with terrorist like osama and if you don't believe that you better watch out or there will be a plain stuck in your ass

1) 12 years of inspections= failure (inspections did nothing)

2) as for the plane comment, proves my point.

by **SilverSurfer** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 12:07 pm

woooow

you having a bad day the plain was a joke J.O.K.E.

i know it took long before they really started working but a month before the war started all was going well inspectors could see everything etc.

but you are right they did nothing cause you guys stopped it when there were finally some results

by **Allister Fiend** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:11 pm

Originally posted by [A.S.H.]SilverSurfer
woooow

you having a bad day the plain was a joke J.O.K.E.

i know it took long before they really started working but a month before the war started all was going well inspectors could see everything etc.

but you are right they did nothing cause you guys stopped it when there were finally some results

Your still joking aren't you...I thought so, cause only someone who has been in denial would say a statement like you did.

Remind me not to put you in charge of my portfolio as what you consider "results" would leave me broke and living on the streets.

Allister Fiend

by **Ruci** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:13 pm

Guys Iraq is not going as a cakewalk. What you see in the news shows that Iraqi Freedom is going like that but I assure you it is no cakewalk.

by **Allister Fiend** » Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:16 pm

Originally posted by -HaVoC-

We took the Palestinians land and gave it to Israel. That doesn't seem very fair now does it. In either case, the murder of innocent men, woman and children is the sign of uneducated people that are deeply rooted in religious facism.

I feel we need to at least divide the land between the Israeli's and the Palestinians. The problem is they worship the same damn land.

It won't matter if they have their own land, they really don't want the land, if they did, they would have accepted it years ago when at least 80% or more was offered to them (they could have accepted that and then worked on the remainder later). No one in the middle east will be happy until Israel is completely wiped off the planet.

Allister Fiend

Who's next after Saddam?

Who's next after Saddam?

Who is online